🚚 at no charge SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.7/5 from 938+ reviews
Vintage βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller

Beads For Jewelry Making #866

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.7 out of 5 (938 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$1​
$1.67
Sale
βœ“ gratis distribution on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Set of 40 4mm Glass Beads

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
swift fulfillment

↩️
uncomplicated Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Beads For Jewelry Making #866

Set of 40 4mm Glass Beads

This product is superb for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 40694

Category: Vintage > Supplies > Bead

Original Price: $1.67 USD

Sale Price: $1 USD​

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand fresh

🚚 distribution & Returns

βœ“ on the house shipment on orders over $50

Standard transport: 3-5 business days​

Express dispatch: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.7
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 4302 reviews
TT
Thomas Taylor βœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago Β· Cleveland, OH
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Really fabulous
Personally, the Beads For Jewelry Making #866 fits my needs and I’m satisfied. Packaging was plain.​
44 people found this helpful
DC
Daniel Clark βœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago Β· recent York, NY
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Exceptional quality
After some use, the Beads For Jewelry Making #866 is hassle-complimentary to use and it’s fine overall.
35 people found this helpful
AH
Andrew Hall βœ“ Verified Purchase
4 months ago Β· Louisville, KY
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Totally worth it
Personally, the Beads For Jewelry Making #866 fits my needs which is good enough.
17 people found this helpful
JB
Justin Baker βœ“ Verified Purchase
6 months ago Β· San Jose, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
Outstanding quality
So far, the Beads For Jewelry Making #866 does its job and it meets expectations.
33 people found this helpful
JB
James Brown βœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago Β· Boston, MA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Brilliant Beads For Jewelry Making #866
Honestly, the Beads For Jewelry Making #866 performs as expected so I’m okay with it. Packaging was elementary.
21 people found this helpful