🚚 at no charge SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.1/5 from 154+ reviews
Vintage βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller

Sharper image reading light

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.1 out of 5 (154 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$26.9
$44.83
Sale
βœ“ gratis distribution on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Sharper Image Cordless Clip-On Reading Light

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
swift fulfillment
↩️
uncomplicated Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Sharper image reading light

Sharper Image Cordless Clip-On Reading Light​

This product is superb for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 58277

Category: Vintage > Houseware > Lights

Original Price: $44.83 USD

Sale Price: $26.9 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand fresh

🚚 distribution & Returns

βœ“ on the house shipment on orders over $50

Standard transport: 3-5 business days

Express dispatch: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.1
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 8004 reviews
TT
Thomas Taylor βœ“ Verified Purchase
7 months ago Β· Charlotte, NC
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
No complaints
After a few days, the Sharper image reading light still works well.
13 people found this helpful
LJ
Lisa Johnson βœ“ Verified Purchase
3 months ago Β· Jacksonville, FL
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Impressed!
From my experience, it is user-friendly to use so I’m okay with it.
31 people found this helpful
HP
Heather Perez βœ“ Verified Purchase​
5 months ago Β· Oakland, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
solely what I wanted
After a few days, the Sharper image reading light works as described and it works for me.
4 people found this helpful
DA
David Anderson
1 month ago Β· San Jose, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
Outstanding quality
Honestly, the Sharper image reading light works well enough and it’s fine overall. Packaging was straightforward.
4 people found this helpful
JB
James Brown βœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago Β· Atlanta, GA 
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
ideal purchase
After a few days, the Sharper image reading light does its job and it works for me.
28 people found this helpful