🚚 at no charge SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.2/5 from 194+ reviews
Vintage βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller

Y2K 2003 L VS Silky Shorts Nwot

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.2 out of 5 (194 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$42.75
$71.25
Sale
βœ“ gratis distribution on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Never worn please feel free to check out the rest of my stuff quick shipping

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
express distribution
↩️
straightforward Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Y2K 2003 L VS Silky Shorts Nwot

Never worn please feel on the house to check out the rest of my stuff rapid shipping

This product is superb for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 342858

Category: Vintage > Clothing > Shorts

Original Price: $71.25 USD

Sale Price: $42.75 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand fresh

🚚 distribution & Returns

βœ“ at no charge dispatch on orders over $50

Standard shipping: 3-5 business days​

Express transport: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.2
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 5173 reviews
JA​
Joshua Allen
6 months ago Β· Albuquerque, NM
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
A must-have
To be fair, the Y2K 2003 L VS Silky Shorts Nwot performs as expected so I’m okay with it.
37 people found this helpful
BW
Brandon Wright
11 months ago Β· San Jose, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
ideal Y2K 2003 L VS Silky Shorts Nwot
To be fair, it works fine so it’s acceptable.
26 people found this helpful
NH
Nicole Harris βœ“ Verified Purchase
2 weeks ago Β· Indianapolis, IN
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
astonishing Y2K 2003 L VS Silky Shorts Nwot
Satisfied overall.
47 people found this helpful
TM
Tyler Mitchell βœ“ Verified Purchase
2 months ago Β· Philadelphia, PA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
fabulous quality
Personally, the Y2K 2003 L VS Silky Shorts Nwot feels solid and I don’t regret it.
13 people found this helpful
JM
Jessica Moore
3 months ago Β· Albuquerque, NM
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Exceptional quality
Nice design and good build quality Y2K 2003 L VS Silky Shorts Nwot.
49 people found this helpful