🚚 at no charge SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.1/5 from 753+ reviews
Vintage βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller

Pair Antique pewter candle stick holder

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.1 out of 5 (753 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$22​
$36.67
Sale
βœ“ gratis distribution on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Pair Antique pewter candle stick holder

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
swift fulfillment
↩️
uncomplicated Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Pair Antique pewter candle stick holder

Pair Antique pewter candle stick holder​

This product is superb for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 644538

Category: Vintage > Antiques > 100 Years Or Older

Original Price: $36.67 USD

Sale Price: $22 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand fresh

🚚 distribution & Returns

βœ“ on the house shipment on orders over $50

Standard transport: 3-5 business days

Express dispatch: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.1
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 2647 reviews
KC​
Kayla Campbell βœ“ Verified Purchase
2 months ago Β· Houston, TX
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Highly satisfied
The Pair Antique pewter candle stick holder feels okay, not low-cost.​
45 people found this helpful
TM
Tyler Mitchell βœ“ Verified Purchase
4 months ago Β· Tulsa, OK
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Absolutely fancy it
Nice product with solid Pair Antique pewter candle stick holder.
34 people found this helpful
AH
Andrew Hall βœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago Β· St. Louis, MO
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Simply fantastic
Honestly, it works fine and I don’t regret it.
43 people found this helpful
MR
Mike Reynolds βœ“ Verified Purchase
4 months ago Β· Cleveland, OH
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
delightful product
Honestly, the Pair Antique pewter candle stick holder works as described and it meets expectations.
47 people found this helpful
TM
Tyler Mitchell βœ“ Verified Purchase
4 months ago Β· Dallas, TX
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
solely what I wanted
It took a little time to arrive, but the Pair Antique pewter candle stick holder is fine.
37 people found this helpful