🚚 at no charge SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.2/5 from 711+ reviews
Outdoor βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller

Patio Heater

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.2 out of 5 (711 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$59
$98.33
Sale
βœ“ gratis distribution on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Patio Heater! only-arrived without tags. Just took it out of the box to make sure it worked! Comes with remote!

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
express distribution
↩️
straightforward Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Patio Heater

Patio Heater! recent without tags. solely took it out of the box to make sure it worked! Comes with remote!​

This product is superb for anyone looking for quality Outdoor products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 764227

Category: Outdoor > Outdoor Heating & Cooking > Patio Heaters

Original Price: $98.33 USD

Sale Price: $59 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand fresh

🚚 distribution & Returns

βœ“ at no charge dispatch on orders over $50

Standard shipping: 3-5 business days

Express transport: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.2
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 3604 reviews
MR
Matthew Robinson βœ“ Verified Purchase
3 months ago Β· Boston, MA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Highly satisfied
At first, the Patio Heater works fine and it works for me.
3 people found this helpful
JW
Jennifer Wilson βœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago Β· Raleigh, NC
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
supreme Patio Heater ever
For the price, the Patio Heater is practical and I’m satisfied.
18 people found this helpful
RH
Ryan Hill βœ“ Verified Purchase​
5 months ago Β· Jacksonville, FL
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Highly satisfied
To be fair, the Patio Heater feels solid and I’m satisfied.
35 people found this helpful
KC
Kayla Campbell
8 months ago Β· Albuquerque, NM
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Absolutely faultless
Satisfied customer. Good Patio Heater.
27 people found this helpful
KC
Kayla Campbell βœ“ Verified Purchase
1 month ago Β· Raleigh, NC

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Outstanding!
I wouldn’t say it’s astonishing, but the Patio Heater is decent.
26 people found this helpful