🚚 at no charge SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.3/5 from 753+ reviews
Men βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller

ROLL NECK TEE - Long sleeved top

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.3 out of 5 (753 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$29.99
$49.98
Sale
βœ“ gratis distribution on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Neckline : Crew neckCollar : Polo neckSheer : Semi-sheerPattern : PlainArticle number : LG522O01Z-A11

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
swift fulfillment
↩️
uncomplicated Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

ROLL NECK TEE - Long sleeved top

Neckline : Crew neck
Collar : Polo neck
Sheer : Semi-sheer
Pattern : Plain
Article number : LG522O01Z-A11

This product is superb for anyone looking for quality Men products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 786371

Category: Men > Clothing > T-shirts & Polos

Original Price: $49.98 USD

Sale Price: $29.99 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand fresh

🚚 distribution & Returns

βœ“ on the house shipment on orders over $50

Standard transport: 3-5 business days​

Express dispatch: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.3
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 1626 reviews
JM​
Jessica Moore
9 months ago Β· Seattle, WA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
adore it!
Personally, the ROLL NECK TEE - Long sleeved top feels solid and I don’t regret it.
24 people found this helpful
HP
Heather Perez βœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago Β· Seattle, WA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
ideal purchase
Personally, the ROLL NECK TEE - Long sleeved top does its job and I’m satisfied.
26 people found this helpful
WG
William Garcia βœ“ Verified Purchase
4 weeks ago Β· San Diego, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Highly satisfied
The ROLL NECK TEE - Long sleeved top is decent.
24 people found this helpful
AC
Amber Carter βœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago Β· Denver, CO
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
top ROLL NECK TEE - Long sleeved top ever
After a few days, it feels okay and I’m satisfied.
7 people found this helpful
JD
John Davidson βœ“ Verified Purchase
4 months ago Β· Boston, MA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
Outstanding quality
To be fair, it performs as expected which is good enough.
50 people found this helpful