🚚 at no charge SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.7/5 from 135+ reviews
Outdoor βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller

Wooden boho bead strands (4)

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.7 out of 5 (135 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$22.56
$37.6
Sale
βœ“ gratis distribution on this item β€’ Limited time offer

only-arrived Wooden beads 12 foot strands each 4 strands round wood beads

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
express distribution
↩️
straightforward Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Wooden boho bead strands (4)

recent Wooden beads
12 foot strands each
4 strands round wood beads

This product is superb for anyone looking for quality Outdoor products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 1067066

Category: Outdoor > Patio Furniture > Hammocks

Original Price: $37.6 USD

Sale Price: $22.56 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand latest

🚚 distribution & Returns

βœ“ on the house shipment on orders over $50

Standard fulfillment: 3-5 business days​

Express transport: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.7
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 7939 reviews
JB​
Justin Baker βœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago Β· Miami, FL
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
top purchase ever
The Wooden boho bead strands (4) is uncomplicated to use.
3 people found this helpful
SM
Sarah Miller βœ“ Verified Purchase
2 months ago Β· Albuquerque, NM
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Highly urge!
After a few days, the Wooden boho bead strands (4) is practical and it’s fine overall.
11 people found this helpful
JM
Jessica Moore βœ“ Verified Purchase
2 weeks ago Β· Atlanta, GA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
fancy love love!
In daily use, it works fine and it works for me. Works fine so far.
21 people found this helpful
AW
Ashley White βœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago Β· Orlando, FL
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
faultless purchase
So far, the Wooden boho bead strands (4) feels okay so it’s acceptable. No setup issues.
31 people found this helpful
HP
Heather Perez βœ“ Verified Purchase
5 months ago Β· San Diego, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
A must-have
The Wooden boho bead strands (4) is smaller than I thought, still usable.
36 people found this helpful