🚚 at no charge SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.8/5 from 925+ reviews
Electronics βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller

Epson 3d glasses *2 pack*

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.8 out of 5 (925 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$50
$83.33
Sale
βœ“ gratis distribution on this item β€’ Limited time offer

This is for two packs of 3D glasses for smart TVs and projection screens

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
swift fulfillment
↩️
uncomplicated Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Epson 3d glasses *2 pack*

This is for two packs of 3D glasses for smart TVs and projection screens​

This product is superb for anyone looking for quality Electronics products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 2371303

Category: Electronics > TV & Video > Other

Original Price: $83.33 USD

Sale Price: $50 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand fresh

🚚 distribution & Returns

βœ“ on the house shipment on orders over $50

Standard transport: 3-5 business days

Express dispatch: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.8
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 5786 reviews
AH
Andrew Hall βœ“ Verified Purchase
7 months ago Β· Milwaukee, WI
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
fabulous product
Feels sturdy enough. The Epson 3d glasses *2 pack* doesn’t feel low-cost.
15 people found this helpful
JW
Jennifer Wilson βœ“ Verified Purchase
4 months ago Β· Columbus, OH

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
fancy it!
To be fair, the Epson 3d glasses *2 pack* works fine and it works for me.
17 people found this helpful
AR
Aaron Roberts βœ“ Verified Purchase
2 months ago Β· Orlando, FL
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
terrific value for money
At first, it does the job and it’s fine overall.
5 people found this helpful​
DA
David Anderson βœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago Β· Albuquerque, NM
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†​
splendid Epson 3d glasses *2 pack*!
Honestly, it feels okay and it works for me.
15 people found this helpful
CE
Christina Evans βœ“ Verified Purchase
6 months ago Β· Nashville, TN
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Highly satisfied
So far, the Epson 3d glasses *2 pack* is basic to use which is good enough.
7 people found this helpful